All the Money in the World review – plodding kidnap drama | Film

Ridley Scott's story of the abduction of Jean Paul Getty III shows little sense of urgency

Michelle Williams and Mark Walhlberg in All the Money in the World. Photograph: Claudio Iannone/Sony

Ridley Scott's plodding biographical drama tells the story of the kidnapping of 16-year-old John Paul Getty III (Charlie Plummer), and his attempts by his mother, Gail (Michelle Williams), to get his rapacious billionaire grandfather, J Paul Getty (Christopher Plummer, no relation), to pay the ransom.

It is my favourite thing when movie titles appear as dialogue in films, so imagine my glee when Roman Duris's kidnapper, Cinquanta, calls up Gail and sneers down the phone in his best Italian accent: "Get it from your father-in-law, he has all the money in the world." Based on John Pearson's 1995 book Painfully Rich: The Outrageous Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Heirs of J Paul Getty, the film is obsessed with the concept of wealth and its accumulation. "There's a purity in beautiful things that I've never been able to find in people," says Plummer's Getty, whose cheapness is as much a plot point as his wealth. It doesn't make for particularly thrilling viewing until the film's final third, which sees the kidnappers beginning to get as annoyed as the audience is about the dragged-out ransom plotline. There's a nasty scene of an ear being severed and a quite good car chase that get things moving, but it's a slog to get there.

Distractingly, the film was originally shot with Kevin Spacey as Getty, who was replaced by Plummer after facing allegations of sexual misconduct in late 2017. An extravagance perhaps to reshoot Getty's scenes, though cheaper than the price Sony might have had to pay regarding the critical fallout. It's impossible to watch without imagining Spacey in the role, or at least looking for the joins in the film.

Since you're here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven't put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I'm happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information. Thomasine F-R.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.